Remember the days of the multivolume encyclopedia? Not long ago nearly every home had a set gathering dust on the bookcase.
Not anymore, thanks to computer technology. Research materials are now condensed into easily searchable CD-ROMs. And the unprecedented growth of the Internet gives us a staggering amount of information, literally at our fingertips.
One of the most interesting variants is “Wikipedia”—a completely online, free encyclopedia compiled by contributions from its users. It can be a helpful, fascinating source of information, but somehow the idea of everyone contributing their “two cents” to an article makes me a little uneasy about using that information as a primary source of authority and reliability.
Hopefully you are not among them, but some skeptics view the Bible as if it were compiled like a Wikipedia article. With more than 40 contributing authors spanning several centuries, they say, it cannot be completely accurate. But Scripture sets the record straight. There is only one author. Peter wrote, “Prophecy never had its origin in the will of man” (2 Peter 1:21). In other words, we are not reading the mere thoughts of Moses, David, Isaiah, Paul, or Peter. Rather, the words of the Bible come directly from God, put to paper by men “as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.”
Which means that we find incredible unity, clarity, and commonality flowing through the Old and New Testaments. The truths expressed in Daniel’s writing from the palace courts of Babylon are mirrored in John’s words from the isle of Patmos, hundreds of years later. The themes of God’s character, of man’s rebellion, and of God’s glorious plan of redemption wind their way through each page. Further additions, revisions, or retractions are unthinkable and unnecessary because God’s Word is confidently complete.
If what you need is a quick glance at the history of jazz music, the opinions and perspectives offered in Wikipedia might be helpful. But, if you’re looking for meaning and purpose and the answers to life’s deepest questions, a multiplicity of conflicting opinions won’t help.
Thank God that He has given us what we need for every challenge and crossroad of life as His clear and trustworthy voice speaks to us through His Word!
YOUR JOURNEY…
- What are the dangers of treating God’s Word like Wikipedia?
- How does your view of the authority of God’s Word affect your commitment to live by it?
- How are the themes of God’s Word tied together between the Old and New Testaments?
1 comment:
1
Those who doubted and questioned or unbelieving the words of GOD be it in written form, as in the scritptures, audible voice and truth messages by his chosen vessel committing sin. And God refers them as wicked hearted people and these people have no place in heaven with him but rather in hell befitting Satan who fought God when he was in heaven; refused to submit to God's law /word.
2
The old Testament church depicted or foreshowed or pre figurement of the New Testament's modern church in every aspect of God's truth.
God had rejected the Jew in the wildness, a type of church because they rejected his prophet Moses a type of Jesus Christ was like rejecting GOD and God had to raise a new generation Church. Same with Israel, the Jews when they rejected Jesus Chirst the prophet and messanger of God, God had to reject Israel a type of moden church, referred as the church of Laodicean -the faithless modern church as declared by God is found in the book of revelation. 'and God spit them out of his mouth..' And today God has prepared and raise his chosen end time prophet even before his birth, to do the Father's endtime plan and purposes to preach the truth similar as Jesus Christ's ministry and his workings like never before.
Post a Comment